New Rule: Along with politics and religion, add science to the list of things you should never discuss in polite company. Or with family. Or with coworkers. Like the first two taboo talking points, it’s simply too volatile a subject.
Really?
Now, this doesn’t really make sense, right? Science isn’t a matter of opinion, it’s based on facts and data. Any conflict can be resolved by simply reviewing the data, evaluating sources, and establishing the consensus of experts in the field. Right?
Not so much. At least, not anymore.
Scientific dissent
Look, we can’t even get more than 4 out of 5 dentists to agree on a toothpaste.
But for whatever reason, most of us are not saying, “What about that other dentist? I can’t believe in this toothpaste until there’s proof of its effectiveness!”
In science, dissension from scientific consensus is an important part of scientific development. Theories should be continually questioned and tested. But to many people, any dissenting opinion from just one doctor or scientist signals that a matter is unsettled. “The science isn’t clear!”, they proclaim.
“You say there is a medical and scientific consensus that new vaccine technology is safe and effective? Well, I saw a Doctor on TV saying he wasn’t sure. So you believe what you want and I’ll believe what I want.“
But it’s not just about dissenting opinions.
Let’s not kid ourselves. These days, science is encased in religious and political beliefs.
Religionized
40% of Americans are Creationists, rejecting Evolution.
Much of this same 40% believe Earth is less than 10,000 years old, rather than the scientific consensus of more than 13 billion years old.
Often, people who disagree with the dominant science do so because the science is contrary to their religious beliefs.
Politicized
Many people believe the response to the Covid-19 pandemic, and the vaccine campaign, are based on a political agenda to remove individual freedoms and pave the way for socialism.
They may also believe climate change is invented or exaggerated to promote a world government or nuclear power.
Not just conservatives
It’s not all Christians or conservatives that rebel against mainstream scientific consensus.
The liberal community takes issue with scientific evidence, as well. This group tends to be opposed to, and wary of, the consumption of GMO foods even though the scientific community widely regards these foods as safe.
Just don’t
Maybe you’ve experienced the difficulty as I have. It is more and more treacherous to discuss some scientific topics with others.
What people decide they are, and are not, willing to accept is entangled in their worldview. Despite scientific evidence; despite expert consensus.
So it’s best not to bring up science-y subjects at all.
Some helpful tips
Here are some do’s and don’t’s to help you navigate tricky scientific topics in your next conversation:
Don’t say: This forest has probably been here for millions of years.
Do say: This forest is nice and shady.
Don’t say: Vaccines are a life-saving medical advancement.
Do say: Vitamin C is good.
Don’t say: It sure is hot out today!
Do say: ……
Really
This post is a little bit tongue-in-cheek. We definitely do need to talk about science. A LOT.
But first, we need to learn how.
Want more like this? Try this post about talking to friends and family about conspiracy theory beliefs.
Pingback: Remember when the news was boring and it didn’t suck?